Cyber Essentials and the fractional CTO
What Cyber Essentials and Cyber Essentials Plus cover, why SMEs and fintechs need them, the common gaps, and how a fractional CTO gets you certified and keeps you there.
What Cyber Essentials and Cyber Essentials Plus cover, why SMEs and fintechs need them, the common gaps, and how a fractional CTO gets you certified and keeps you there.
How to manage a software development supplier or agency, especially if you are not technical: clear expectations, ownership, outcome-based progress, a technical check, and deliberate change.
Looking for a fractional CTO with fintech and automated underwriting experience in the UK? What to look for, the regulation and model governance that decide it, and where ScaleAround fits.
How a technology review, technical due diligence and a technology audit differ, and how to tell which one your situation actually calls for.
A practical playbook for rescuing a stalled or failing software project: stabilise and diagnose, find the real cause, reset the plan, rebuild confidence, and decide honestly about continuing.
Why care technology puts particular demands on leadership, where a senior technology voice earns its place, and how sector-aware experience de-risks it.
When a Cardiff founder should bring in a fractional CTO rather than hire full-time, what the local market offers, and where ScaleAround fits as a Cardiff-based partner.
What procurement and due diligence questionnaires ask about AI, and how to be ready: a register, a policy, a named owner, a clear data line, and standard answers drafted once.
Why fractional CTO and CIO leadership suits Welsh scale-ups, how it fits the funding and ecosystem here, and where ScaleAround fits as a Wales-based partner.
How an independent technology review of an outsourced or offshore development team checks the code, ownership, security and delivery, so non-technical clients know where they stand.
The signs a SaaS business needs a fractional CTO, what they focus on, and how they help you scale, ship and stand up to investor scrutiny.
What good delivery governance looks like without the bureaucracy: clear ownership, outcome-based progress, early risk management, a decision route, and a sensible cadence.